tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post6935668992085206008..comments2024-01-06T04:13:41.492-07:00Comments on A Paladin In Citadel: Prediction Of Carnac The MagnificentAaron E. Steelehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07789462075611254929noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-65408614303041674702012-04-14T16:52:41.678-06:002012-04-14T16:52:41.678-06:00That confirms it's an apocryphal definition.
...That confirms it's an apocryphal definition.<br /><br />If so, that's correct saying OSR incontrovertibly embraces 3E and 4E.Hamel™https://www.blogger.com/profile/10274145010591107989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-66803881264094378462012-04-14T16:28:09.129-06:002012-04-14T16:28:09.129-06:00Shrug. I'm not a forgite so I don't subscr...Shrug. I'm not a forgite so I don't subscribe to that dogma. Whatever floats your boat.Aaron E. Steelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07789462075611254929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-55574702266487976092012-04-14T16:23:34.158-06:002012-04-14T16:23:34.158-06:00No, that vision doesn't stick to the GNS Model...No, that vision doesn't stick to the GNS Model.<br /><br />First of all, there can be only 1 primary label: over a long period of time (aka Campaign) there will ALWAYS be 1 dominant label, so D&D can't be equally G+N+S.<br /><br />In addiction, GNS Model has no formale geometrical shape.Hamel™https://www.blogger.com/profile/10274145010591107989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-67285767524225304362012-04-14T14:22:15.363-06:002012-04-14T14:22:15.363-06:00No. DnD was a swords and sorcery SIMULATOR, allow...No. DnD was a swords and sorcery SIMULATOR, allowing you and the DM to NARRATE the growth of your characters, employing GAMIST elements to adjudicate conflict.<br /><br />DnD was always firmly in the mushy middle, at least until 4E came along.Aaron E. Steelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07789462075611254929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-4214778279750741882012-04-14T13:38:49.924-06:002012-04-14T13:38:49.924-06:00D&D never belonged to the Narrativist/Simulati...D&D never belonged to the Narrativist/Simulationist Creative Agendas, in any of its incarnations.<br /><br /><br />D&D is historically a Gamist game, focused on facing adversities created by the DM (with 4E being the most Gamist oriented).Hamel™https://www.blogger.com/profile/10274145010591107989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-22996292093078248382012-04-14T10:12:45.007-06:002012-04-14T10:12:45.007-06:00Carnac is never wrong.Carnac is never wrong.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4891509519427970698.post-61739947243803925242012-04-14T10:09:01.064-06:002012-04-14T10:09:01.064-06:00Just out of curiosity, where do the other versions...Just out of curiosity, where do the other versions of D&D's evolution fall in this diagram?The Great Khanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18342783210750664992noreply@blogger.com